pseudoarchaeology findings

Archaeology has unfortunately been manipulated many times to support various nationalist movements. Believe in Atlantis? The scientific effect involved is always at the very limit of detection. These archaeologists want to win you back to science. You can also look forward to a future post of mine debunking their debunking page. I HV an assignment that I HV to do,so it based psuedoarcheology.So I HV to write an article based this question Why psuedoarcheology is not a credible encounter? There are literally thousands of archaeological frauds, fakes, and hoaxes that would be termed pseudoarchaeology. Despite rejection by archaeologists that the stones belong to a Chinese settlement (and actually belong to mid-20th century structures), Chiasson still believes, as he has published, twice, in his theories. Archaeology can be sensational when a big discovery happens but for the most part it’s about the small things slowly being revealed rather than a small piece of archaeology being hyper inflated and sensationalized with a fake story of mystery and wonder. Hyper-diffusionist theories are those which suggest contact occurred between cultures with extreme distance between them, resulting in a transfer of cultural traits from one culture to the other (deemed to explain the “advancement” of a culture). A second example of a hyper-diffusionist theory is the Solutrean hypothesis. Share Your Story, Join the Discussion or Seek Advice.. Pseudoscience itself has been a nuisance to some scientists. Proudly powered by WordPress. Yet a deeper look into the implications and effects of pseudoarchaeology reveals a much more sinister interpretation that could weaken the validity of scientific archaeology and its analysis-based findings. Speaking Up and Speaking Out; Collective Efforts in the Fight to Reclaim the Public Perception of Archaeology. Some people feel that it is better to ‘rework’ the evidence than to alter fanciful history. We need to be willing to speak out against pseudoarchaeological theories as they arise, and we need to be willing to share our work in a way that satisfies public curiosity while also accurately educating them (i.e. This theory rests entirely on similarities between stone tools. Simply put, pseudoarchaeology refers to archaeological theories and/or interpretations that are rejected by the majority of the archaeological community. Archaeologists need to understand firstly how and why pseudoarchaeological theories exist and persist. The danger is further exacerbated when pseudoscientists claim they are locked in a David-vs.-Goliath-type battle against the “mainstream” scientific community. 9, 2019 , 5:15 PM. Psuedoarcheology prides itself on praying on the mass to eat up a story based on supernatural and alien activity blended in with mystery like a novel which as you pointed out with “Edgar Cayce’s mystic revelations of Atlantis and the future.” But as we both have pointed out that some of the greatest problems arise with nationalism that attempts to use the good of archaeology as a means to justify some political right of being with blurring of what is real and what is fault to aid an agenda that has nothing to do with archaeology. When the media portrays the pseudoarchaeological beliefs being based off scientific research, people could start to question the validity of the “mainstream” science claims that we have become so accustomed to. It can be false for a number of reasons. Pseudoarchaeology is sometimes called fantastic archaeology but by whatever name it is given it is best identified as pseudo-science dressed in archaeological garments. The danger stems from public consumption of this media, which in turn influences the public’s view on scientific thought and rationality. This is then used as vindication for their “right” to publish and disseminate their materials as scientific fact. To this end, psuedoarcheology publications and other forms of media should not be censored in the name of upholding science. This is not because the findings and hypotheses published are wild or fantastical, some arguably bordering on outright fabrication (such as Edgar Cayce’s mystic revelations of Atlantis and the future), but because they cloak themselves in the mantle of scientific analysis and logic. All opinions are my own and do not reflect any company, organization, and/or school I am part of. Pseudoarchaeology—also known as alternative archaeology, fringe archaeology, fantastic archaeology, cult archaeology, and spooky archaeology—refers to interpretations of the past from outside the archaeological science community, which reject the accepted datagathering and analytical methods of the discipline.

Baird's Rat Snake Lifespan, European Ensemble Weather Model, Woodside Share Price Today, Jaguar Facts, Man City Lineup, Tiaa Bank Field Capacity, Adele Songs Lyrics, Guard Filter Owner, Cba Economic Forecasts,

Leave a Comment

Twój adres email nie zostanie opublikowany. Pola, których wypełnienie jest wymagane, są oznaczone symbolem *